It is
difficult to imagine a more inefficient method to deliver a medication to
children than to dissolve it in the water supply of a local authority. Without going into the moral aspects of
mass medication, the sheer stupidity of mixing it into the whole water supply
most of which is used for lawns and gardens, industry, cleaning, washing, and
flushing toilets is mind blowing.
Way
less than 1% is drunk, with less than a quarter of that by the targeted part of
the population, children. The rest
goes straight down the drain, making the whole process dubious from the moral
perspective, doubtful from the economic one, and suspect environmentally.
Now
that the Queensland government has decided to allow freedom of choice on
fluoridation, residents of the Gympie Regional Council were expecting a
referendum on the subject, but council has refused this. The most galling aspect to this is the
arrogance expressed by councilors in their insistence that they should make the decisions for the community, not the community itself:
A motion by Cr Ian Petersen to
suspend fluoridation pending a referendum, drew ridicule from many councillors
and was only supported by Mary Valley councillor Julie Walker. …
"We are here because we need to
make decisions for the community," pro-fluoride councillor Mark McDonald
said. "A lot of people don't
even know this discussion is going on. They rely on us," he said. He told the last Gympie Regional
Council meeting of the year he firmly opposed any change. "I believe fluoridation is good
for the community and good for our children's teeth," he said.
Various councillors described
anti-fluoridation views as the work of "a noisy minority" and
"conspiracy theorists".
…
Cr Wayne Sachs said the council had a
responsibility to continue with fluoridation.Cr Mick Curran said the current
policy was supported by the World Health Organisation, the Australian Medical
Association and the Australian Dental Association. "We are not conducting compulsory mass medication. "People have the option of
drinking council water. "They
can drink tank water or purchase bottled water," he said.
Cr Dyne said: "I think there is
enough medical evidence to say it benefits children's teeth. We have an
obligation to look after the community," Cr Dyne said. "There is a noisy minority that
will oppose it and who will oppose immunisation," he said.
Cr Petersen's motion called for a
referendum. "I am not qualified to decide which scientific argument is
correct, but I am qualified to decide that the democratic process should
prevail."
Addressing Cr Dyne he said, "As
a member of the LGAQ policy committee you would be aware of the policy position
... which states, 'it is a principle of ethical public health policy that
mass involuntary medication must never proceed without the express consent of
the community'."
The suggestion by the Mayor that opponents
of fluoridation will also oppose immunization is trite and offensive, as is his
talk of noisy minorities. The poll
taken with the report, which is admittedly unscientific, has that ‘noisy
minority’ at 86% of the respondents.
With the exceptions of Crs Petersen
and Walker appear to be arrogant and condescending towards the residents who
oppose them on this issue. The
council’s ‘obligation to look after the community’ should only go as far as the
provision and maintenance of roads and infrastructure. We already have duplicated health
services from the state and federal governments, and don’t need another.
Still, ratepayers should be glad that
Crs Dyne, Perrett, Sachs, Curran, and company haven’t got a bee in their
bonnets yet over the rate of depression in the community. Who knows what might end up in the
water if they did?