Suicide sparks calls for ‘Charlotte’s law'
After a high profile
death of someone who appears to have been wronged or was a victim of crime,
there tends to be efforts to enact some sort of legislation named after
them. This is usually a bad idea
owing to the knee-jerk nature of the effort, failure to examine other aspects
to the case, and legislators desire to be seen to be doing something resulting
in something draconian.
Charlotte Dawson, a
model and TV personality with something of a troubled past committed suicide a
few days ago, and a campaign has been launched for a law against cyber-bullying
as result of her history of opposing such idiots. One such incident has been dealt with here in the past.
What is ignored in
all of this is her history of depression, mental illness, and her financial and employment difficulties:
CHARLOTTE Dawson was found dead at her Woolloomooloo home yesterday, following a long and very public battle with depression. Friends of Dawson’s have spoken of a sense of inevitability around her death, revealing that in recent weeks the prominent media personality’s mental state seemed specially fragile.
It is believed Dawson was struggling financially, having borrowed up to $80,000 from friends as she tried to keep up the rent on her $1200-a-week apartment.
She had also been axed from her role on the popular Foxtel TV show Australia’s Next Top Model, and last November parted ways with management company Chic Management after they said her battles with mental illness were ‘damaging her brand’.
Only a week ago, Dawson’s ex-husband Scott Miller had appeared on Channel Nine’s 60 Minutes to talk about his drug addiction and the role it had played in the breakdown of their marriage. Dawson, who described Miller as the ‘love of her life’, said at the time she wasn’t sure if she would be strong enough to watch the interview. …
While her
battles with trolls and bullies has some possible relevance, there appear to be
more significant and more immediate reasons for her actions. Her death is tragic, but is not a good
reason to introduce new and more restrictive legislation, no matter how badly
we feel about it.
She brought a lot of the vitriol on herself, especially by trying to get someone into trouble at work over a purely personal dispute. What did she expect if she did bitchy things like that, praise? She was also pretty shallow.
ReplyDeleteI feel much the same way on this, although I feel that her instability caused her to get involved in other peoples fights in the first place. Its a shame but I see no reason for special laws.
Delete