Irony; Shooters Party votes for gun control in WA senate rerun
Now that the red dust has settled in the rerun of the
Western Australian senate election, it is time to digest some of the
results and consider some of the deals which brought it about.
The Liberal Democratic Party, like most of the minors
suffered a fall in primary votes, due in no small part by the massive spending
of billionaire, Clive Palmer in support of his Palmer United Party. Despite this, we have maintained our
position of first among the minor parties right behind the majors and big money
ones.
The first thing that springs out to meet the eye is the
deals done by the Shooters and Fishers Party. S&F is something of a mixed blessing to shooters,
offering a forum to bitch against the draconian Howard gun laws and
occasionally gaining minor concessions for shooters in New South Wales owing to
their balance of power position in the upper house there, but otherwise, they
have achieved precious little.
The main reason for this is that rather than adopt the
libertarian position that all law abiding citizens have a right to gun
ownership for whatever non-coercive purpose they wish, the SFP accept the
status quo and essentially bargain for whatever scraps the NSW government is
prepared to toss them from the big table in order to keep them quiet.
Worse still, their leadership have a habit of regarding
shooter friendly parties as competitors and preferencing away from them in
elections. Despite the fact that
the LDP have better policies on firearms than SFP and more rational arguments
in favour of them, SFP normally preference the coalition which took their guns
off them in the first place.
This time they became truly bizarre, in that they not only
preferenced the Palmer United Party, but were instrumental in getting their
candidate elected. They actually
expended 91% of their votes to do it.
This would not be that much of a problem if PUP were likely to support
their position, but the opposite is the case as Clive Palmer opposes gun ownership:
"The Katter Party is an extreme right party and our party is a more centre party."And we disagree on certain things, such as guns ... a whole lot of things Bob's in favour of."
Mr Palmer said the leaders might like each other personally, but a political party had to share the same beliefs.
"There's more chance of us merging with the Labor or Liberal parties than with Bob."
Shooters tend
to be very responsible people, they have to be as each carries on his shoulders
a responsibility for the rest of the shooting community. The leadership of their party though, is
clearly incompetent, out of its depth, inarticulate, lacking in judgment, and
need replacing.
In addition
to this, whatever drop-kick did this preference deal needs to be drummed out at
the first opportunity.
No comments:
Post a Comment