Climate science debunked.
A fascinating and satirical article from of all places, the (your own, ABC) It makes you wonder if their PC department was on strike for it to go through, I can’t inagine what they were thinking of:
If IPCC Climate scientists were Physicists: The IPCC has found that the total net anthropogenic forcing is 1.6 W.m-2 with an error range of 0.6 to 2.4 W.m-2. If the IPCC’s same errors for Radiative Forcing Components were applied to the universal gravitational constant, IPCC climate scientists would tell us that the UGC is 6.67 × 10-11 N·m2/kg2 with a range of 2.5-10 N·m2/kg2. They would then assure us there is 90% certainty that acceleration due to gravity on Earth at sea level is in the range 3.7 to 14.7 m.s-2. IPCC climate scientists would tell us apples may be as light as a feather or as heavy as a brick. They would tell us apples fall down, but they’d be unable to tell us how fast, and occasionally they may actually fall upwards. As a result of their endeavours, Newtonian physics and Relativity would be tossed on its head. Quantum physics, built on the uncertainty principal, would have no place in a world where the science is settled. Speaking about gravity IPCC climate scientists would say things like: "The fact is that we can't account for the lack of gravity at the moment and it is a travesty that we can't." They would earnestly explain that there was no statistically significant gravity from 1995, and suggest that anyone disagreeing with their assessment must be a gravity denier.
The article in full is here. Warning on comments section; The lefties are out in force.
You sure that was the ABC? [clicks link to check] ... Bloody hell. They had a coup there or something?
ReplyDeleteMy first thought was that there was a pay dispute with the PC checkers.
ReplyDeleteIn fairness though they did publish an article by me that they requested. It was a couple of years ago, and the lefties were outraged that someone like me would be given space to air such controversial views.
I think from time to time they like to toss the cat among the pigeons.
Ah, token impartiality then?
ReplyDeleteSomething like that. I think they get a bit tired of leftie mutual grooming and decide to put on something that they can hate.
ReplyDelete