Trigger warning:

This site may, in fact always will contain images and information likely to cause consternation, conniptions, distress, along with moderate to severe bedwetting among statists, wimps, wusses, politicians, lefties, green fascists, and creatures of the state who can't bear the thought of anything that disagrees with their jaded view of the world.

Nov 12, 2010

Climate science debunked.

A fascinating and satirical article from of all places, the (your own, ABC) It makes you wonder if their PC department was on strike for it to go through, I can’t inagine what they were thinking of:

If IPCC Climate scientists were Physicists: The IPCC has found that the total net anthropogenic forcing is 1.6 W.m-2 with an error range of 0.6 to 2.4 W.m-2. If the IPCC’s same errors for Radiative Forcing Components were applied to the universal gravitational constant, IPCC climate scientists would tell us that the UGC is 6.67 × 10-11 N·m2/kg2 with a range of 2.5-10 N·m2/kg2. They would then assure us there is 90% certainty that acceleration due to gravity on Earth at sea level is in the range 3.7 to 14.7 m.s-2. IPCC climate scientists would tell us apples may be as light as a feather or as heavy as a brick. They would tell us apples fall down, but they’d be unable to tell us how fast, and occasionally they may actually fall upwards. As a result of their endeavours, Newtonian physics and Relativity would be tossed on its head. Quantum physics, built on the uncertainty principal, would have no place in a world where the science is settled. Speaking about gravity IPCC climate scientists would say things like: "The fact is that we can't account for the lack of gravity at the moment and it is a travesty that we can't." They would earnestly explain that there was no statistically significant gravity from 1995, and suggest that anyone disagreeing with their assessment must be a gravity denier.

The article in full is here. Warning on comments section; The lefties are out in force.


  1. You sure that was the ABC? [clicks link to check] ... Bloody hell. They had a coup there or something?

  2. My first thought was that there was a pay dispute with the PC checkers.

    In fairness though they did publish an article by me that they requested. It was a couple of years ago, and the lefties were outraged that someone like me would be given space to air such controversial views.

    I think from time to time they like to toss the cat among the pigeons.

  3. Something like that. I think they get a bit tired of leftie mutual grooming and decide to put on something that they can hate.