UK Government wins the Inaugural Gorbel Prize for Green Policies that have Inconvenient Outcomes.
The Carbon Sense Coalition has created “The Gorbel Prize for Green Policies
that have Inconvenient Outcomes”.
By Viv Forbes, Chairman,
(Image) Copyright Steve Hunter (who has given permission for any media to
reproduce.)
The Chairman of Carbon
Sense, Mr Viv Forbes, said that so many green policies that appear to have
useful environmental goals fail to analyse properly the long-term unforeseen
consequences.
Quote: Green politicians need to
learn Newton’s Law of Government Regulations: – “Whenever government legislates
to force an economic outcome, the long term effect will be equal and opposite
to that intended.”
Nowhere is this more
apparent than in the world of green politics, where laws designed to help the
environment are harming the environment. To publicise this stupidity, the
Carbon Sense Coalition has created “The Gorbel Prize for Green Policies that
have Inconvenient Outcomes”.
The winner of the Inaugural
Gorbel Prize is the UK government whose green policies aim to make it
uneconomic to burn coal. So the tax-payer funded Green Investment Bank has
loaned £100 million to help convert the huge Drax coal-burning power station in
Yorkshire to burning “sustainable biomass”. This is part of a huge finance
package of one billion pounds to get the biomass green tick, earn renewable
energy subsidies, and avoid the need to buy carbon credits.
Where do they plan to get
the “sustainable biomass”? Each year 7.5 million tonnes of wood chips will be
imported from North American forests to replace 4.5 Mt of coal.
The land required to
produce wood at this rate is immense - about three million acres of forest per
year.
Also, wood is less dense
than coal with less energy per tonne and a greater volume per tonne. Thus a
greater tonnage and a far greater volume of wood have to be handled to get the
same energy. This huge volume of wood has to be harvested, hauled, chipped,
dried, trucked, shipped and stored using more carbon fuels - all to produce
more expensive electricity.
There is one real benefit
from the scheme. When the whole process is considered, using wood will put more
carbon dioxide back into the atmosphere than using coal. This will make the
forests grow faster.
The same goofy green
policies that have pushed Drax into burning forests also apply in Australia.
Maybe wood chips from our carbon credit forests will soon fuel Yallourn or
Hazelwood power stations?
Such green stupidity will
take us back to the BC era (before coal) when forests and hillsides were
stripped bare of trees to fuel stoves, heaters, boilers, charcoal makers and
smelters.
We would all be better off
if Drax burned coal, produced cheap electricity, saved those forests and, to
satisfy green dogma, planted a token forest of new trees.
For
those who find the above unbelievable, here is one reference
Nominations
are invited for future recipients of the Gorbel Prize.
Meanwhile,
Al Gore gets $100 million from Big Oil. See:
It’s Official – Carbon
dioxide is non-Toxic
Disclosure:
Viv Forbes has a degree in natural sciences and a lifetime of practical
professional experience in subjects relevant to climate history, the carbon
cycle and energy technology and economics. He is old enough to be retired and
is self-employed and thus will be largely unaffected by the long term effects
of today’s silly carbon policies. But he does use electricity, breeds
ruminants, uses some wind and solar power and holds shares in, and acts as a
non-executive director of a small Australian coal exploration company. He is
founding Chairman of the Carbon Sense Coalition.
No comments:
Post a Comment